Four
The substances the tradition names — and what we do not sell
Keshya is the classical category of substances held to be good for hair, defined by a phrase as plain as it sounds: keshaya hitam yat tat, that which is beneficial for hair. What is less often mentioned is that the category is subdivided, and the subdivisions do different work.
The three classes of Keshya Dravya
| Class | What it is held to do | Route described |
| Kesha Vardhana |
Promotes growth — makes hair dense and thick |
— |
| Kesha Ranjana |
Restores the natural colour of hair |
Through Ranjaka Pitta and Bhrajaka Pitta |
| Kesha Sanjanana |
Strengthening — the origin and substance of hair |
Through Asthi Dhatu and Shukra Dhatu |
Two of the three are the ones that matter on a page about hair thinning. Kesha Ranjana is about colour, and it is set out on our page about greying. Kesha Vardhana and Kesha Sanjanana are the classes concerned with growth and with substance.
Where our knowledge runs out
We can give you the Kesha Ranjana list from the review literature: Bhringaraja, Neeli, Madayantika, Amalaki, Sharapunkha and Indravaruni.
We have not been able to establish the full substance lists for Kesha Vardhana and Kesha Sanjanana to a standard we are willing to publish. Secondary sources give them, and they do not entirely agree with one another. Rather than pick the version that suited us and present it as settled, we are leaving this space open and looking for the primary references.
If you know the shloka, we would be glad to hear from you: laboratory@radicousa.com.
Sixteen substances, and only fourteen of them plants
One thing we can be specific about. Bhavaprakasha Nighantu, the sixteenth-century materia medica, names sixteen substances as possessing Keshya property. A review of that list finds them distributed as follows.
The sixteen Keshya dravyas of Bhavaprakasha Nighantu
| Origin | Count | Named example |
| Plant | 14 | — |
| Animal | 1 | Avi-dugdha — sheep’s milk |
| Mineral | 1 | Kasisa — green vitriol, an iron sulphate |
This is worth sitting with for a moment, because it corrects something the word “Ayurvedic” is routinely used to imply. The classical tradition was not a plant-only pharmacology. It used minerals and animal products without hesitation, and an entire branch of it — Rasashastra — is devoted to mineral and metallic preparations.
A product being all-plant is not what makes it Ayurvedic. It is a modern commitment, and in our case a deliberate one.
A note about iron, and about a decision made twenty years ago
Kasisa is an iron sulphate. It sits in the classical Keshya list, and iron salts have a very long history in plant dyeing generally — they deepen and fix colour, and they do it fast.
When Radico was developing its colours, a partner in Japan — drawing on traditional Japanese dyeing practice — made exactly that suggestion. A trace of iron, one part in ten thousand, would cut the development time substantially. Iron is one of the most abundant elements on earth. At that concentration nobody would have noticed.
Sanjeev Bhatt said no, on the grounds that 100% organic either means every ingredient or it means nothing. It is why Radico asks for one to two hours on the hair rather than thirty minutes.
The tradition would have permitted it. Kasisa is right there in the Keshya list, and no classical author would have objected to a mineral in a hair preparation. That refusal was not an Ayurvedic principle. It was a commitment we made for our own reasons, and it costs us something the tradition never asked us to give up. The full story is on our About page.
What we do not sell
Which brings us to the point of this section.
Radico does not make a Kesha Vardhana product.
We make a cosmetic hair colour, and single herbs for washing and for masks. None of it is sold as a hair growth treatment, and none of it is formulated to be one. If you have arrived at this page because your hair is thinning and you are looking for something to stop it, we do not have that, and we would rather tell you plainly than sell you a mask and let you find out over six months.
Some of our herbs are named in classical hair contexts — bhringaraja most of all, whose synonyms in the nighantus are almost entirely about hair. That is a fact about a name in a text. It is not evidence that milled leaf in a water paste changes what a follicle does, and we have not found published work that establishes it.
What our powders do is described elsewhere on this site in terms we can support: reetha and shikakai wash through saponins, methi makes a slippery gel, colorless henna deposits almost no colour, amla is acidic. Those are physical and chemical descriptions, and none of them is a claim about hair growth.
If hair loss is what you are dealing with, the useful next step is a diagnosis. A dermatologist can tell you which of several quite different conditions you have, and some of them have treatments that work. A qualified Ayurvedic physician can assess your Prakriti and the state of your doshas, which is what the classical approach requires before any of the treatment described in the next section would be chosen. A website cannot do either.